Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zizou Bergs vs James Kent Trotter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bergs vs Trotter analysis and find out who is favored!
Zizou Bergs vs James Kent Trotter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bergs 1 - 0 Trotter
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bergs has won 51.85% of points on their second serve, while Trotter has won 50.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bergs, in recent form, has won 50.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Trotter has won 45.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.45% and 29.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bergs has saved 60.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Trotter has saved 65.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bergs has won 65.75% of matches played (W/L 48/ 25), with Trotter winning 59.68% (W/L 37/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bergs has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 70% (W/L 14/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 80/ 51). Trotter has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 44/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Bergs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9), where as Trotter has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 33/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bergs winning 1 times and Trotter being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bergs winning 2 and Trotter winning 0. The last match between Bergs and Trotter was at the Yokkaichi Challenger, 01-12-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Zizou Bergs getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bergs and Trotter have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bergs winning 0 times and Trotter 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bergs winning 0, and Trotter 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bergs has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.82 while Trotter has played against players with an average rank of 305.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bergs has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Trotter has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bergs has converted 40.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Trotter has converted 40.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
81
Rank
81
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
274
Rank
274
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
63% (285-170)
Career Total W/L
58% (67-48)
67% (28-14)
YTD W/L
60% (18-12)
$471,835
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Zizou Bergs | James Kent Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:7 | 1:27:7 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (34/60) | 57% (39/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (27/34) | 74% (29/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (13/26) | 37% (11/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (29/69) | 33% (20/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zizou Bergs | James Kent Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (28/14) | 60% (18/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (67/40) | 58% (37/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (541/475) | 54% (350/303) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 65% (11/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 77% (17/5) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 67% (6/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.62 | 0.72 |
| Aces Total | 309 | 231 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 134 | 104 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:38 | 1:37:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 302.33 | 288.37 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1930/3120) | 58% (1152/1991) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (1407/1930) | 78% (895/1152) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (617/1190) | 51% (426/839) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (127/315) | 41% (64/157) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1264/3216) | 36% (699/1929) |
| Slam W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (12/4) | 60% (18/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (25/36) | 59% (17/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (12/15) | 58% (7/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (29/23) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (29/6) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 15% (13/2) |
Zizou Bergs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Zizou Bergs
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Omar Jasika
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
82%
(
58 of
71)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Zizou Bergs
63%
(
85 of
136)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
128)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
36%
(
49 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
49 of
128)
136
Total Points Won
128
|
6-3 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Maximilian Marterer
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
22%
(
18 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
71%
(
100 of
141)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
125)
15
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
3
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
62 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
125)
140
Total Points Won
126
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mathias Bourgue
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Joris De Loore
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Chidekh
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Zizou Bergs
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Juncheng Shang
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Brandon Holt
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
51%
(
55 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
113)
4
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
113)
115
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Christian Langmo
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Trevor Svajda
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
James Kent Trotter
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Alafia Ayeni
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bergs Vs Trotter Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bergs are available here and Trotter photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Zizou Bergs
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
